Why I Couldn't Vote for Obama
Or Why I Voted Nader in 2008
Imagine me running for the White House with no clear policy on education reform. You might find something I had said about it on my immense website if you worked hard enough, but otherwise you would have to rely on a proxy to tell you that I really felt that education was the responsibility of parents and local government should be left to make decisions.
Imagine in various Education Special Interest venues, people reported me saying that I supported a good education for every American but when I spoke in front of this or that group, I said I supported a far reaching proposal to create special schools for racial minority children where they would receive an education "at least as good as" what the racial majority children get. This way we could be address the problems of educational discrimination.
How would you feel if you were told to vote for me?
I would hope that you wouldn't be fooled into accepting "separate but equal" for any of America's children. And yet most American's are still happy to accept "separate but equal" for gay relationships and any children living in them.
But this is, in fact, what the Obama campaign has asked Gay Americans to accept. If you go to the issues page at BarrackObama.com, it's hard to see where equal rights for sexual minorities fits his campaign's view of the issues. We don't merit a mention under Civil Rights or Family. Maybe we're included under Foreign Relations -- because that's just how I feel the Obama campaign has treated the LBGTQ community this election cycle.
Oh yeah, I know he's happy to speak to gay groups here and there and tell them they have nothing to worry about but the real fact is the Democrat Party and Obama's Campaign take for granted that LBGTQ voters will vote for them without question. After all, the Republican's are openly hostile to our concerns and we were their favorite tool of division and derision in 2004. This year the McCain camp seems to be using us as a way to prove to wavering voters that a vote for Obama is a vote for Gay Marriage and the Gay Agenda. I don't think anything could be further from the truth, but when has truth been an issue in an election?
Nationally, I feel LBGTQ Americans are in about the same position as they were pre-Clinton when no one wanted to talk about us. Will either of these candidates fight to end "Don't Ask, Don't Tell?" Will either of these candidates be willing to say the Federal government needs to address legalized marriage in California, most of New England, and maybe even New York (if Dems take predicted control of the state Senante)? I doubt it.
Thus it was hard for me to decide how to vote this year. I tried to figure out which candidate most closely tracked with my views on those issues both critical and important to me and I had to go Nader. Granted, I don't think has a snow ball's chance but neither does McCain at this point. So unlike 2000, when I feared a Bush Presidency more than anything, this time I voted my conscience.
Go to "Equal Rights for Gays and Lesbians" and you'll see Nader still supports us
And no, I want neither Biden nor Palin a heart-attack away from the Presidency.
Imagine me running for the White House with no clear policy on education reform. You might find something I had said about it on my immense website if you worked hard enough, but otherwise you would have to rely on a proxy to tell you that I really felt that education was the responsibility of parents and local government should be left to make decisions.
Imagine in various Education Special Interest venues, people reported me saying that I supported a good education for every American but when I spoke in front of this or that group, I said I supported a far reaching proposal to create special schools for racial minority children where they would receive an education "at least as good as" what the racial majority children get. This way we could be address the problems of educational discrimination.
How would you feel if you were told to vote for me?
I would hope that you wouldn't be fooled into accepting "separate but equal" for any of America's children. And yet most American's are still happy to accept "separate but equal" for gay relationships and any children living in them.
But this is, in fact, what the Obama campaign has asked Gay Americans to accept. If you go to the issues page at BarrackObama.com, it's hard to see where equal rights for sexual minorities fits his campaign's view of the issues. We don't merit a mention under Civil Rights or Family. Maybe we're included under Foreign Relations -- because that's just how I feel the Obama campaign has treated the LBGTQ community this election cycle.
Oh yeah, I know he's happy to speak to gay groups here and there and tell them they have nothing to worry about but the real fact is the Democrat Party and Obama's Campaign take for granted that LBGTQ voters will vote for them without question. After all, the Republican's are openly hostile to our concerns and we were their favorite tool of division and derision in 2004. This year the McCain camp seems to be using us as a way to prove to wavering voters that a vote for Obama is a vote for Gay Marriage and the Gay Agenda. I don't think anything could be further from the truth, but when has truth been an issue in an election?
Nationally, I feel LBGTQ Americans are in about the same position as they were pre-Clinton when no one wanted to talk about us. Will either of these candidates fight to end "Don't Ask, Don't Tell?" Will either of these candidates be willing to say the Federal government needs to address legalized marriage in California, most of New England, and maybe even New York (if Dems take predicted control of the state Senante)? I doubt it.
Thus it was hard for me to decide how to vote this year. I tried to figure out which candidate most closely tracked with my views on those issues both critical and important to me and I had to go Nader. Granted, I don't think has a snow ball's chance but neither does McCain at this point. So unlike 2000, when I feared a Bush Presidency more than anything, this time I voted my conscience.
Go to "Equal Rights for Gays and Lesbians" and you'll see Nader still supports us
The Nader campaign supports full equal rights for gays and lesbians. While civil unions are a step in the right direction under current federal and state law, they do not afford full and equal rights. There are 1,049 federal rights that are only conferred with marriage. Additionally, at the state level, a civil union is only recognized in the state where it occurs, while a legal marriage, and all the rights that go with it, is recognized in all the states. Thus, the only way to ensure full equal rights is to recognize same-sex marriage.
And no, I want neither Biden nor Palin a heart-attack away from the Presidency.
Labels: Politics
posted by xj at 6:36 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home